jurisdiction must be able to establish
that it is resident under the treaty in
that jurisdiction and is the beneficial
owner of the dividend. The application
of Canada’s general anti-avoidance
rule (GAAR) should also be considered.
Equity contributions made to the
corporation increase the corporation’s
paid-up capital balances, subject to
the foreign affiliate dumping rules.
Distributions made by a private
Canadian corporation (which includes
a subsidiary of a foreign public
corporation) out of paid-up capital
to a non-resident corporation are
treated as a return of capital that is
not subject to Canadian withholding
tax. Distributions out of paid-up capital
will, however, reduce the adjusted cost
base of the shares and, as a result,
may increase the gain otherwise
realized on the sale of the shares of
the corporation in the future. Unlike
many other jurisdictions, Canada
allows for distributions from paid-up
capital before the payment of taxable
dividends. Accounting capital is not the
same as paid-up capital determined for
tax purposes. Paid-up capital is based
on legal stated capital. Therefore,
legal counsel should determine stated
capital and paid-up capital before the
corporation makes a return of capital,
to ensure that the amount distributed
is paid-up capital and not deemed
to be a dividend that is subject to
withholding tax.
Financing
Interest expense paid or payable by a
corporation on borrowed money used
for the purpose of earning income from
a business or property in Canada is
deductible for Canadian tax purposes.
The thin capitalization rules, however,
may limit the deduction of interest
paid by a corporation to non-resident
parties that are related to the Canadian
corporation or that hold a substantial
interest in the Canadian corporation.
In particular, the interest deduction of
the Canadian corporation will be reduced
to the extent that the corporation’s ratio
of interest-bearing debt owing to such
non-resident persons to its equity held
by related non-residents exceeds 1.5:1.
A guarantee is not considered to be a
loan for these purposes.
Non-participating interest payments
made by a resident of Canada to
foreign arm’s-length lenders are not
subject to withholding tax. However,
interest expenses denied pursuant to
the thin capitalization rules are deemed
to be dividends subject to Canadian
withholding tax.
Where financing is to be obtained
from related corporations, interest
payments are subject to withholding
tax at a statutory rate of 25% subject
to reduction by an applicable tax treaty.
The reduced rate varies, depending
on the treaty, but is typically 10% or
15%. For non-participating interest
payments made to US residents, the
withholding rate is reduced to zero
under the Canada-US treaty. Foreign
investors that wish to finance their
Canadian operations from internal
sources may be able to benefit from
the exemption under the Canada-US
treaty by providing the funds through
a US-resident entity. However, such
financing arrangements will be subject
to the limitation-on-benefits article of
the Canada-US treaty and to GAAR.
To qualify for the treaty rate, the
ultimate parent must be publicly listed
on a major US stock exchange and
meet minimum trading requirements,
or it must be majority-owned by
US or Canadian residents. The zero
withholding rate may also apply if the
US entity carries on an active trade or
business that is sufficiently similar and
is substantial relative to the Canadian
business. This may be the case where
a multinational has operating mines in
both countries.
Exit Planning
Capital gains realized by non-residents
on the sale of taxable Canadian property
are subject to tax in Canada. Taxable
Canadian property includes shares of
a Canadian or a foreign corporation
that derives its value principally from
Canadian resource properties. A
number of tax treaties exempt the
sale of such shares from tax in Canada
where the resource property is used
by the corporation in its business
operations. This exemption is not
available in all treaties. In particular,
it is not available in Canada’s treaties
with the United States and Japan. In
these cases, it may again be possible
to use an intermediary holding
corporation in a treaty jurisdiction
to reduce the Canadian taxes
otherwise payable on the disposition
of the shares. Luxembourg and the
Netherlands are jurisdictions that have
tax treaties with Canada containing
this favourable provision, and are
also otherwise favourable holding
corporation jurisdictions.
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
Structuring Mining Investments
|
47