The forensic
accountant versus
data
Data is becoming more and more a
part of everything we, as forensic
accountants and the lawyers who retain
us, deal with on each matter. Part of
our role in helping counsel is to identify,
collect, review, and analyze all relevant
documentation and present our findings
in a way that can be understood by
the end user, which, in addition to the
client and depending on the issue, may
include regulators, other parties to an
action and their legal counsel, and the
court. These steps are all impacted by
the availability, form, and location of
that documentation.
Data collection once focused solely on
paper tucked away in filing cabinets,
warehouses and corner offices. Now,
focus is on servers, computers, PDAs,
and smart phones as sources of data.
There are countless documents that
are loaded into review and eDiscovery
software – how can this information
be filtered efficiently and effectively to
identify the relevant information?
The breadth of data and potential
complications in obtaining it will impact
the time it takes for the forensic
1
Standard Practices for Investigative and Forensic Accounting Engagements, CICA, November 2006.
accountant to complete their work.
Communication between counsel and
the forensic accountant is integral in
managing expectations and timelines.
Accountants who perform forensic
accounting engagements are required
to adhere to the Standard Practices for
Investigative and Forensic Accounting
Engagements (“Standard Practices”).
Forensic accountants are required,
according to these Standard Practices,
to stay within the boundaries of their
expertise. Moving away from their
knowledge or skill base only hurts the
credibility of the report or potential
testimony. This is not to say that
forensic accountants should stay
away from data, but is to say that
data analysis now needs to form part
of a forensic accountant’s area of
expertise. It cannot be ignored.
Data identification,
collection and
analysis
For forensic accounting engagements,
data is now one of the most important
areas of focus. The collection and analysis
of the data, after all, will form the basis
for the estimate of economic loss,
support the investigative facts, or provide
important information on the need for a
fraud risk management program.
It is important for the forensic
accountant to be involved in the
identification and collection of data. The
knowledge gained on how the data was
extracted and filtered is often integral
to a final report. Should testimony be
required, the ability to speak to the
collection of the data may, depending
on the issue, have an impact on the
credibility of the expert witness.
The growth in the amount of data
being created and preserved is causing
forensic accountants to develop new
approaches to efficiently complete
their work. In many ways, dealing with
electronic data is proving to be more
time consuming and risky than when
paper was the dominant medium.
The integrity and completeness of data
has become a primary consideration on
every forensic engagement. As forensic
accountants, we have to constantly be
thinking of more efficient and effective
ways to ensure that engagements
are performed in line with Standard
Practices
1
that govern our profession.
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
22
|
At Risk
|
Volume 7, No. 1